's Data Security Posts
The Hidden Risks Metadata Catalogs Can’t See
The Hidden Risks Metadata Catalogs Can’t See
In today’s data-driven world, organizations are dealing with more information than ever before. Data pours in from countless production systems and applications, and data analysts are tasked with making sense of it all - fast. To extract valuable insights, teams rely on powerful analytics platforms like Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, and Redshift. These tools make it easier to store, process, and analyze data at scale.
But while these platforms are excellent at managing raw data, they don't solve one of the most critical challenges organizations face: understanding and securing that data.
That’s where metadata catalogs come in.
Metadata Catalogs Are Essential But They’re Not Enough
Metadata catalogs such as AWS Glue, Hive Metastore, and Apache Iceberg are designed to bring order to large-scale data ecosystems. They offer a clear inventory of datasets, making it easier for teams to understand what data exists, where it’s stored, and who is responsible for it.
This organizational visibility is essential. With a good catalog in place, teams can collaborate more efficiently, minimize redundancy, and boost productivity by making data discoverable and accessible.
But while these tools are great for discovery, they fall short in one key area: security. They aren’t built to detect risky permissions, identify regulated data, or prevent unintended exposure. And in an era of growing privacy regulations and data breach threats, that’s a serious limitation.
Different Data Tools, Different Gaps
It’s also important to recognize that not all tools in the data stack work the same way. For example, platforms like Snowflake and BigQuery come with fully managed infrastructure, offering seamless integration between storage, compute, and analytics. Others, like Databricks or Redshift, are often layered on top of external cloud storage services like S3 or ADLS, providing more flexibility but also more complexity.
Metadata tools have similar divides. AWS Glue is tightly integrated into the AWS ecosystem, while tools like Apache Iceberg and Hive Metastore are open and cloud-agnostic, making them suitable for diverse lakehouse architectures.
This variety introduces fragmentation, and with fragmentation comes risk. Inconsistent access policies, blind spots in data discovery, and siloed oversight can all contribute to security vulnerabilities.
The Blind Spots Metadata Can’t See
Even with a well-maintained catalog, organizations can still find themselves exposed. Metadata tells you what data exists, but it doesn’t reveal when sensitive information slips into the wrong place or becomes overexposed.
This problem is particularly severe in analytics environments. Unlike production environments, where permissions are strictly controlled, or SaaS applications, which have clear ownership and structured access models, data lakes and warehouses function differently. They are designed to collect as much information as possible, allowing analysts to freely explore and query it.
In practice, this means data often flows in without a clear owner and frequently without strict permissions. Anyone with warehouse access, whether users or automated processes, can add information, and analysts typically have broad query rights across all data. This results in a permissive, loosely governed environment where sensitive data such as PII, financial records, or confidential business information can silently accumulate. Once present, it can be accessed by far more individuals than appropriate.
The good news is that the remediation process doesn't require a heavy-handed approach. Often, it's not about managing complex permission models or building elaborate remediation workflows. The crucial step is the ability to continuously identify and locate sensitive data, understand its location, and then take the correct action whether that involves removal, masking, or locking it down.
How Sentra Bridges the Gap Between Data Visibility & Security
This is where Sentra comes in.
Sentra’s Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) platform is designed to complement and extend the capabilities of metadata catalogs, not just to address their limitations, but to elevate your entire data security strategy. Instead of replacing your metadata layer, Sentra works alongside it enhancing your visibility with real-time insights and powerful security controls.
Sentra scans across modern data platforms like Snowflake, S3, BigQuery, and more. It automatically classifies and tags sensitive data, identifies potential exposure risks, and detects compliance violations as they happen.
With Sentra, your metadata becomes actionable.
From Static Maps to Live GPS
Think of your metadata catalog as a map. It shows you what’s out there and how things are connected. But a map is static. It doesn’t tell you when there’s a roadblock, a detour, or a collision. Sentra transforms that map into a live GPS. It alerts you in real time, enforces the rules of the road, and helps you navigate safely no matter how fast your data environment is moving.
Conclusion: Visibility Without Security Is a Risk You Can’t Afford
Metadata catalogs are indispensable for organizing data at scale. But visibility alone doesn’t stop a breach. It doesn’t prevent sensitive data from slipping into the wrong place, or from being accessed by the wrong people.
To truly safeguard your business, you need more than a map of your data—you need a system that continuously detects, classifies, and secures it in real time. Without this, you’re leaving blind spots wide open for attackers, compliance violations, and costly exposure.
Sentra turns static visibility into active defense. With real-time discovery, context-rich classification, and automated protection, it gives you the confidence to not only see your data, but to secure it.
See clearly. Understand fully. Protect confidently with Sentra.
<blogcta-big>