All Resources
In this article:
minus iconplus icon
Share the Blog

CISO Challenges of 2025 and How to Overcome Them

August 18, 2025
4
Min Read
Data Security

The evolving digital landscape for cloud-first companies presents unprecedented challenges for chief information security officers (CISOs). The rapid adoption of AI-powered systems and the explosive growth of cloud-based deployments have expanded the attack surface, introducing novel risks and threats.

 

According to IBM's 2024 "Cost of a Data Breach Report," the average cost of a cloud data breach soared to $4.88 million - prompting a crucial question: Is your organization prepared to secure its expanding digital footprint? 

Regulatory frameworks and data privacy standards are in a constant state of flux, requiring CISOs to stay agile and proactive in their approach to compliance and risk management.

This article explores the top challenges facing CISOs today, illustrated by real-world incidents, and offers actionable solutions for them. By understanding these pressing concerns, organizations can stay proactive and secure their environments effectively.

Top Modern Challenges Faced by CISOs

Modern CISO concerns stem from a combination of technical complexity, workforce behavior, and external threats. Below, we explore these challenges in detail.

1. AI and Large Language Model (LLM) Data Protection Challenges

AI tools like large language models (LLMs) have become integral to modern organizations; however, they have also introduced significant risks to data security. In 2024, for example, Microsoft's AI system, Copilot, was manipulated to exfiltrate private data and automate spear-phishing attacks, revealing vulnerabilities in AI-powered systems.

Furthermore, insider threats have increased as employees misuse AI tools to leak sensitive data. For instance, the AI malware Imprompter exploited LLMs to facilitate data exfiltration, causing data loss and reputational harm. 

Robust governance frameworks that restrict unauthorized AI system access and implementation of real-time activity monitoring are essential to mitigate such risks.

2. Unstructured Data Management

Unstructured data (e.g., text, images, audio, and video files) is increasingly stored across cloud platforms, making it difficult to secure. Take the high-profile breach in 2022 involving Turkish Pegasus Airlines. It compromised 6.5 TB of unstructured data stored in an AWS S3 bucket, ultimately leading to 23 million files being exposed. 

This incident highlighted the dangers of poorly managed unstructured data, which can lead to severe reputational damage and potential regulatory penalties. Addressing this challenge requires automated classification and encryption tools to secure data at scale. In addition, real-time classification and encryption ensure sensitive information remains protected in diverse, dynamic environments.

3. Encryption and Data Labeling

Encryption and data labeling are vital for protecting sensitive information, yet many organizations struggle to implement them effectively. 

IBM's 2024 “Cost of a Data Breach Report” reveals that companies that have implemented security AI and automation “extensively” have saved an average of $2.2 million compared to those without these technologies.

 

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) highlights the importance of data labeling and classification, requiring organizations to handle personal data appropriately based on its sensitivity. These measures are essential for protecting sensitive information and complying with all relevant data protection regulations.

Companies can enforce data protection policies more effectively by adopting dynamic encryption technologies and leveraging platforms that support automated labeling.

4. Regulatory Compliance and Global Standards

The expanding intricacies of data privacy regulations, such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, pose significant challenges for CISOs. In 2024, Microsoft and Google faced lawsuits for the unauthorized use of personal data in AI training, underscoring the financial and reputational risks of non-compliance.

Companies must leverage compliance automation tools and centralized management systems to navigate these complexities and streamline regulatory adherence.

5. Explosive Data Growth

The exponential growth of data creates immense opportunities but also heightens security risks. 

As organizations generate and store more data, legacy security measures often fall short, exposing critical vulnerabilities. Advanced, cloud-native, and scalable platforms help organizations scale their data protection strategies alongside data growth, offering real-time monitoring and automated controls to mitigate risks effectively.

6. Insider Threats

Both intentional and accidental insider threats remain among the most difficult challenges for CISOs to address. 

In 2024, a North Korean IT worker, hired unknowingly by an American company, stole sensitive data and demanded a cryptocurrency ransom. This incident exposed vulnerabilities in remote hiring processes, resulting in severe operational and reputational consequences. 

Combatting insider threats requires sophisticated behavior analytics and activity monitoring tools to detect and respond to anomalies early. Security platforms should provide enhanced visibility into user activity, enabling organizations to mitigate such risks and secure their data proactively.

7. Shadow Data

In the race to adopt new cloud and AI-powered tools, users are often generating, storing, and transmitting sensitive data in services that the security team never approved or even knew existed. This includes everything from unofficial file-sharing apps to unsanctioned SaaS platforms and ad hoc API integrations.

The result is shadow IT, shadow SaaS, and ultimately, shadow data: sensitive or regulated information that lives outside the visibility of traditional security tools. Without knowing where this data resides or how it’s being accessed, CISOs cannot protect it. These unknown data flows introduce real compliance, privacy, and security risk.

It is critical to expose and classify this hidden data in real time, in order to give security teams the visibility they need to secure what was previously invisible.

Overcoming the Challenges: A CISO's Playbook in 6 Steps

CISOs can follow a structured, data-driven, step-by-step playbook to navigate the hurdles of modern cybersecurity and data protection. However, in today's dynamic data landscape, simply checking off boxes is no longer sufficient—leaders must understand how each critical data security measure interconnects, creating a unified, forward-thinking strategy.

Before diving into these steps, it's important to note why they matter now more than ever: Emerging data technologies, rapidly evolving data regulations, and escalating insider threats demand an adaptable, holistic, and data-centric approach to security. By integrating these core elements with robust data analytics, CISOs can build an ecosystem that addresses current vulnerabilities and anticipates future data risks.

1. First, Develop a Scalable Security Strategy 

A strategic security roadmap should integrate seamlessly with organizational goals and data governance frameworks, guaranteeing that risk management, data integrity, and business priorities align. 

Accurately classifying and continuously monitoring data assets, even as they move throughout the organization, is a must to achieve sustainable scale. This solid data foundation empowers organizations to quickly pivot in response to emerging threats, keeping them agile and resilient.

The next step is key, as the right mindset is a must.

2. Build a Security-First Culture

Equip employees with the knowledge and tools to secure data effectively; regular data-focused training sessions and awareness initiatives help reduce human error and mitigate insider threats before they become critical risks. By fostering a culture of shared data responsibility, CISOs transform every team member into a first line of defense. 

This approach ensures that everyone is on the same page toward prioritizing data security. 

3. Leverage Advanced Tools and Automation

Utilize state-of-the-art platforms for comprehensive data discovery, real-time monitoring, automation, and visibility. By automating routine security tasks and delivering instant data-driven insights, these features empower CISOs to stay on top of new threats and make decisions based on the latest data. 

Naturally, even the best tools and automation require a strategic, data-centric approach to yield optimal results.

4. Implement Zero-Trust Principles 

Implement a zero-trust approach that verifies every user, device, and data transaction, ensuring zero implicit trust within the environment. Understand who has access to what data, and implement least privilege access. Continuous identity and device validation boosts security for both external and internal threats. 

Positioning zero trust as a core principle tightens data access controls across the entire ecosystem, but organizations must remain vigilant to the most recent threats.

5. Evaluate and Update Cybersecurity Frameworks

Regularly assess security policies, procedures, and data management tools to ensure alignment with the latest trends and regulatory requirements. Keep a current data inventory, and monitor all changes. Ongoing reviews maintain relevance and effectiveness, preventing outdated defenses from becoming liabilities.

For optimal data security, cross-functional collaboration is key.

6. Encourage Cross-Departmental Collaboration

Work closely with other teams, including IT, legal, compliance, and data governance, to ensure a unified and practical approach to data security challenges. Cooperation among stakeholders accelerates decision-making, streamlines incident response, and underscores the importance of security as a shared enterprise objective.

By adopting this data-centric playbook, CISOs can strengthen their organization's security posture, respond to threats quickly, and reduce the likelihood and impact of breaches. Platforms such as Sentra provide robust, data-driven tools and capabilities to execute this strategy effectively, enabling CISOs to confidently handle complex cybersecurity landscapes.  When these steps intertwine, the result is a robust defense that adapts to the ever-shifting digital landscape - empowering leaders to stay one step ahead.

The Sentra Edge

Sentra is an advanced data security platform that offers the strategic insights and automated capabilities modern CISOs need to navigate evolving threats without compromising agility or compliance. Sentra integrates seamlessly with existing processes, empowering security leaders to build holistic programs that anticipate new risks, reinforce best practices, and protect data in real time.

Below are several key areas where Sentra's approach aligns with the thought leadership necessary to stay ahead of modern cybersecurity challenges.

Secure Structured Data

Structured data - in tables, databases, and other organized repositories, forms the backbone of an organization’s critical assets. At Sentra, we prioritize structured data management first and foremost, ensuring automation drives our security strategy. While securing structured data might seem straightforward, rapid data proliferation can quickly overwhelm manual safeguards, exposing your data. By automating data movement tracking, continuous risk and security posture assessments, and real-time alerts for policy violations, organizations can offload these burdensome yet essential tasks. 

This automation-first approach not only strengthens data security but also ensures compliance and operational efficiency in today’s fast-paced digital landscape.

Secure Unstructured Data

Securing text, images, video, and other unstructured data is often challenging in cloud environments. Unstructured data is particularly vulnerable when organizations lack automated classification and encryption, creating blind spots that bad actors can exploit.

 

In response, Sentra underscores the importance of continuous data discovery, labeling, and protection—enabling CISOs to maintain visibility over their dynamic cloud assets and reduce the risk of inadvertent exposure.

Navigate Complex Regulations

Modern data protection laws, such as GDPR and CCPA, demand rigorous compliance structures that can strain security teams. Sentra's approach highlights centralized governance and real-time reporting, helping CISOs align with ever-shifting global standards.

 

By automating repetitive compliance tasks, organizations can focus more energy on strategic security initiatives, ensuring they remain nimble even as regulations evolve.

Tackle Insider Threats

Insider threats—accidental and malicious—remain one of the most challenging hurdles for CISOs. Sentra advocates a multi-layered strategy that combines behavior analytics, anomaly detection, and dynamic data labeling; this offers proactive visibility into user actions, enabling security leaders to detect and neutralize insider risks early. 

Such a holistic posture helps mitigate breaches before they escalate and preserves organizational trust.

Be Prepared for Future Risks

AI-driven attacks and large language model (LLM) vulnerabilities are no longer theoretical—they are rapidly emerging threats that demand forward-thinking responses. Sentra's focus on robust data control mechanisms and continuous monitoring means CISOs have the tools they need to safeguard sensitive information, whether it's accessed by human users or AI systems. 

This outlook helps security teams adapt quickly to the next wave of challenges. By emphasizing strategic insights, proactive measures, and ongoing adaptation, Sentra exemplifies an industry-leading approach that empowers CISOs to navigate complex data security landscapes without losing sight of broader organizational objectives.

Conclusion

As new threat vectors emerge and organizations face mounting pressures to protect their data, the role of CISO will become even more critical. Addressing modern challenges requires a proactive and strategic approach, incorporating robust security frameworks, cutting-edge tools, and a culture of vigilance.

Sentra's platform is a comprehensive data security solution designed to empower CISOs with the tools they need to navigate this complex landscape. By addressing key hurdles such as AI risks, structured and unstructured data management, and compliance, Sentra enables companies to stay on top of evolving risks and safeguard their operations. The modern CISO role is more demanding than ever, but the right tools make all the difference. Discover how Sentra's cloud-native approach empowers you to conquer pressing security challenges.

<blogcta-big>

Ward Balcerzak is Field CISO at Sentra, bringing nearly two decades of cybersecurity experience across Fortune 500 companies, defense, manufacturing, consulting, and the vendor landscape. He has built and led data security programs in some of the world’s most complex environments, and is passionate about making true data security achievable. At Sentra, Ward helps bridge real-world enterprise needs with modern, cloud-native security solutions.

Subscribe

Latest Blog Posts

Kristin Grimes
Kristin Grimes
David Stuart
David Stuart
March 5, 2026
3
Min Read

Meet Sentra at RSAC 2026: AI Data Readiness, Continuous Compliance, and Modern DLP in Action

Meet Sentra at RSAC 2026: AI Data Readiness, Continuous Compliance, and Modern DLP in Action

RSAC 2026 is shaping up to be one of the most important RSA Conferences to date, especially for security teams navigating AI adoption, Copilot readiness, and large-scale data governance. At RSA Conference 2026 in San Francisco, Sentra is bringing together security leaders from SoFi, Nestlé, and PennyMac to discuss how modern enterprises are preparing their data for AI, strengthening governance, and rethinking DLP in an AI-driven world.

If you’re attending RSAC 2026, here’s where to find us, and why it matters.

CISO AI Copilot Readiness Roundtables at RSAC 2026

March 23–26 | W Hotel | Steps from Moscone

AI assistants like Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini are transforming how employees access enterprise data. What used to require manual searching across drives, mailboxes, and SaaS applications can now be surfaced instantly.

That shift is powerful, but it also forces CISOs to confront a difficult question: is our data actually AI-ready?

During RSAC 2026, Sentra is hosting closed-door CISO AI Copilot Readiness Roundtables featuring security leaders from SoFi, Nestlé, and PennyMac. These sessions are intentionally intimate, and designed for candid discussion rather than vendor presentations.

No slides. No marketing decks. Just real-world insights on what’s working, and what isn’t - as organizations operationalize AI securely. Register for a Roundtable.

AI Data Readiness for 70+ PB: SoFi at RSA Conference 2026

March 24 | 7:45 AM – 9:00 AM

Preparing data for AI at scale is not theoretical, especially when you’re dealing with more than 70 petabytes.

Join SoFi’s former Director of Product Security, Pritam Mungse, as he shares how SoFi approached AI data readiness using Sentra. The session will explore how large financial institutions can gain visibility into massive data environments, reduce exposure risk, and enable Copilot and ML adoption without compromising governance.

If you’re managing AI adoption in a complex, high-scale environment, this RSAC 2026 session offers practical lessons grounded in real-world execution. Register for the SoFi Session.

Continuous Compliance with AI Visibility: PennyMac at RSAC 2026

March 25 | 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM

For a $500B U.S. mortgage lender like PennyMac, compliance is not a one-time event, it’s a continuous obligation.

In this RSA Conference 2026 session, CISO Cyrus Tibbs will share how PennyMac uses Sentra to gain visibility into sensitive data, automate Jira masking workflows, and transform compliance from a reactive burden into a proactive advantage.

As regulatory expectations increase around AI systems and data governance, continuous compliance becomes a strategic capability rather than an audit checkbox. Register for the PennyMac Session.

Nestlé’s Blueprint for Modern DLP Compliance at RSAC 2026

Global enterprises face an even more complex challenge: governing data consistently across Azure, Snowflake, Microsoft 365, and Purview, while planning for AI and Copilot integration. At RSAC 2026, Nestlé’s Dean Rossouw and Manuel Garcia will share how they built a governance framework that integrates large data catalogs with modern DLP controls. The session explores how traditional policy-based DLP can evolve into a model that combines deep data intelligence with enforcement aligned to business context.

For organizations operating across regions and platforms, this blueprint offers a practical path forward. Register for the Nestlé Session.

Visit Sentra at Booth #N4607 at RSA Conference 2026

If you’re walking the floor at RSAC 2026, stop by Booth N4607 to explore how Sentra enables AI-ready data security.

Our team will be showcasing how organizations can:

  • Eliminate risk from AI agents and ML model adoption
  • Discover unknown sensitive data exposures
  • Add AI-powered intelligence to improve DLP precision

Rather than simply layering new policies on top of old systems, we’ll demonstrate how DSPM and DLP can work together in a unified architecture. Book a Demo at Booth N4607.

Executive Briefings at RSAC 2026

For security leaders looking to go deeper, Sentra is offering private briefings during RSA Conference 2026. These sessions provide the opportunity to discuss real-world data security challenges, proven best practices, and lessons learned from enterprise deployments.

Each discussion is tailored to your environment, whether your focus is AI readiness, exposure reduction, or continuous compliance. Schedule a Personal Briefing.

Special Events During RSAC 2026

The Women in Security Documentary

March 24 & 25 | AMC Metreon 16

Just steps from Moscone Center, join us for a special screening celebrating women redefining leadership in cybersecurity. The red carpet begins at 4:00 PM, with the screening starting at 4:45 PM.

Register Now

Sentra + Defensive Networks RSA Dinner

March 25 | 7:00 PM | The Tavern, San Francisco

We’re hosting an intimate, relationship-centered dinner for security leaders navigating today’s most pressing AI and data security challenges. Designed for meaningful dialogue and peer exchange, this event offers space for authentic conversation beyond the conference floor.

Why AI Data Security Defines RSAC 2026

The defining theme of RSA Conference 2026 is clear: AI has changed the security equation. AI systems do not create new data, but they dramatically increase its discoverability, accessibility, and movement. That reality exposes gaps between visibility and enforcement that many organizations have tolerated for years. To secure AI adoption, organizations need more than isolated tools. They need continuous data intelligence, context-aware enforcement, and feedback between the two. That is the architecture Sentra is bringing to RSAC 2026.

See You at RSA Conference 2026

If you’re attending RSAC 2026 in San Francisco, we’d love to connect.

📍 Booth N4607
📅 March 23–26, 2026
📍 Moscone Center

Join us to explore how AI-ready data security becomes practical, measurable, and operational- not just theoretical.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
David Stuart
David Stuart
March 4, 2026
4
Min Read

Microsoft Copilot Chat Incident: A Wake-Up Call for AI Assistant Security in Microsoft 365

Microsoft Copilot Chat Incident: A Wake-Up Call for AI Assistant Security in Microsoft 365

The recent Microsoft Copilot Chat incident, in which enterprise users reportedly saw AI-generated summaries that included confidential content from Drafts and Sent Items despite sensitivity labels and DLP policies, has reignited a critical conversation about AI assistant security.

Microsoft clarified that Copilot did not bypass underlying access controls. But that explanation only addresses part of the problem. The real issue isn’t whether Microsoft Copilot broke security controls. It's that Copilot inherits user permissions, and can apply its extensive abilities to uncover data the user may have long forgotten (or never properly secured in the first place).

Copilot didn’t create new risks, it surfaced existing exposure - instantly, at scale, and in a way that made it visible. For organizations deploying Microsoft Copilot, that distinction matters.

Why the Microsoft Copilot Incident Matters More Than It Appears

Microsoft Copilot operates within the permissions of the signed-in user. On paper, that sounds safe. In reality, it means Copilot can access everything the user can access - across years of accumulated data.

In a typical Microsoft 365 environment, that includes:

  • Emails stretching back years
  • Linked SharePoint Online documents
  • OneDrive folders shared broadly across teams
  • External guest-accessible sites
  • Archived projects no one has reviewed in years

When Copilot summarizes a mailbox, it can follow embedded links into SharePoint and OneDrive. If those linked files contain overshared financials, HR investigations, contracts, or regulated data, Copilot can surface insights from them in seconds.

Previously, this data exposure existed quietly in the background. AI assistants remove friction:

  • No need to manually search multiple systems
  • No need to remember file locations
  • No need to understand organizational silos

A single natural-language prompt can traverse it all.

That is the shift. And that is the risk.

AI Assistants Change the Data Risk Model

Traditional enterprise security assumes that risk is constrained by human effort. Data may technically be accessible, but if it requires time, institutional knowledge, or manual searching, exposure is limited.

AI assistants like Microsoft Copilot eliminate those barriers.

Instead of asking, “Who has access to this file?” organizations must now ask:

What can an AI assistant synthesize from everything a user can access?

This is a fundamentally different security model.

The Microsoft Copilot Chat incident demonstrated that even when sensitivity labels and DLP policies are in place, unexpected AI-generated outputs can undermine confidence. The concern is not only regulatory exposure, its reputational, operational, and executive trust in AI initiatives.

Why Sensitivity Labels and DLP Are Not Sufficient for Copilot Security

Many organizations rely on Microsoft Purview, sensitivity labels, and Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies to control how information is handled in Microsoft 365.

Those tools are essential, but they are not enough on their own.

In real-world environments:

  • Labels are inconsistently applied
  • Legacy data predates modern classification policies
  • SharePoint sites remain broadly accessible long after projects end
  • OneDrive folders accumulate stale and redundant files
  • Linked documents inherit exposure from misconfigured parent sites

AI assistants operate on access reality, not policy intention. If sensitive data is accessible (even unintentionally) Copilot can surface it. The Copilot Chat incident did not reveal a failure of AI. It revealed a failure of data posture alignment.

Microsoft Copilot Requires AI Data Readiness

Before enabling Copilot broadly across Microsoft 365, organizations need what can be described as AI Data Readiness.

AI Data Readiness means achieving continuous visibility into:

  • Where sensitive data lives
  • How it is shared internally and externally
  • Which SharePoint and OneDrive assets are overshared
  • Whether classification matches actual content
  • What historical data remains unnecessarily accessible

Without this foundation, Copilot becomes a force multiplier for hidden exposure.

With it, Copilot becomes a productivity accelerator.

DSPM: The Missing Layer in Secure Microsoft Copilot Deployment

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) provides the continuous, data-centric visibility required for secure AI adoption.

Rather than focusing solely on permissions or labels, DSPM answers deeper questions:

  • What sensitive and regulated data exists across Microsoft 365?
  • Where is it exposed?
  • What is its purpose? 
  • Who can access it?
  • How does it move?
  • Is it properly classified and governed?

Sentra’s DSPM-driven approach continuously discovers and classifies sensitive data across SharePoint Online, OneDrive, cloud storage, and SaaS platforms. Using AI-enhanced classification, it differentiates routine collaboration documents from high-risk assets such as HR investigations, financial statements, intellectual property, and regulated PII or PHI.

This creates a unified, context-rich map of enterprise data exposure, the exact context Copilot relies on when generating responses.

From Visibility to Remediation

Once visibility exists, security teams can act with precision.

Instead of broadly restricting Copilot access, which reduces productivity, organizations can surgically reduce risk by:

  • Identifying overexposed SharePoint sites containing sensitive data
  • Detecting OneDrive folders shared with large groups or external guests
  • Removing stale, redundant, and “ghost” data
  • Reconciling missing or misaligned sensitivity labels
  • Aligning MPIP and DLP controls with actual content reality

The result is not AI avoidance. It is controlled AI expansion.

The Strategic Shift: Treat Copilot Security as a Data Problem

The Microsoft Copilot Chat incident should not trigger panic. It should trigger maturity.

AI assistants reflect the state of your data. If your Microsoft 365 environment contains overshared, misclassified, or stale sensitive information, AI will surface it.

Organizations that succeed with Microsoft Copilot will be those that:

  • Audit their Microsoft 365 data exposure continuously
  • Reduce unnecessary access before enabling AI at scale
  • Align labels, policies, and actual content
  • Limit AI blast radius through data posture improvements
  • Treat AI adoption as a data governance transformation

The conversation should move from “Is Copilot safe?” to:

Is our data posture ready for Copilot?

When DSPM underpins AI adoption, Copilot shifts from potential liability to competitive advantage.

Final Thought: AI Assistants Don’t Create Risk - They Reveal It

The Microsoft Copilot incident is not an isolated anomaly. It is an early indicator of how AI assistants will reshape enterprise security assumptions. Copilot can only summarize what users already have access to. If access is overly broad, outdated, or misconfigured, AI will expose that reality faster than any audit ever could.

Organizations that invest in AI Data Readiness today will not only prevent future incidents, they will accelerate secure AI transformation across Microsoft 365.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
February 25, 2026
3
Min Read

SOC 2 Without the Spreadsheet Chaos: Automating Evidence for Regulated Data Controls

SOC 2 Without the Spreadsheet Chaos: Automating Evidence for Regulated Data Controls

SOC 2 has become table stakes for cloud‑native and SaaS organizations. But for many security and GRC teams, each SOC 2 cycle still feels like starting from scratch; hunting for the latest access reviews, exporting encryption settings from multiple consoles, proving backups and logs exist - per data set, per environment. If your SOC 2 evidence process is still a patchwork of spreadsheets and screenshots, you’re not alone. The missing piece is a data‑centric view of your controls, especially around regulated data.

Why SOC 2 Evidence Is So Hard in Cloud and SaaS Environments

Under SOC 2, trust service criteria like Security, Availability, and Confidentiality translate into specific expectations around data:

Is sensitive or regulated data discovered and classified consistently?

Are core controls (encryption, backup, access, logging) actually in place where that data lives?

Can you show continuous monitoring instead of point‑in‑time screenshots?

In a typical multi‑cloud/SaaS environment:

  • Sensitive data is scattered across S3, databases, Snowflake, M365/Google Workspace, Salesforce, and more.
  • Different teams own pieces of the puzzle (infra, security, data, app owners).
  • Legacy tools are siloed by layer (CSPM for infra, DLP for traffic, privacy catalog for RoPA).

So when SOC 2 comes around, you spend weeks assembling a story instead of being able to show a trusted, provable compliance posture at the data layer.

The Data‑First Approach to SOC 2 Evidence

Instead of treating SOC 2 as a separate project, leading teams are aligning it with their data security posture management (DSPM) strategy:

  1. Start from the data, not from the infrastructure
  • Build a unified inventory of sensitive and regulated data across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on‑prem.
  • Enrich each store with sensitivity, residency, and business context.

  1. Attach control posture to each data store
  • For each regulated data store, track encryption status, backup configuration, access model, and logging/monitoring coverage as posture attributes.

  1. Generate SOC‑aligned evidence from the same system
  • Use the regulated‑data inventory plus posture engine to produce SOC 2‑friendly reports and CSVs, rather than collecting evidence manually for each audit cycle.

This is exactly the pattern that modern data security platforms like Sentra are implementing.

How Sentra Helps Security and GRC Teams Automate SOC 2 Evidence

Sentra sits across your data estate and focuses on regulated data, with capabilities that map directly onto SOC 2 evidence needs:

Comprehensive data‑store discovery and classification
Agentless discovery of data stores (managed and unmanaged) across multi‑cloud and on‑prem, combined with high‑accuracy classification for regulated and business‑critical data.

Data‑centric security posture
For each store, Sentra tracks security properties—including encryption, backup, logging, and access configuration, and surfaces gaps where sensitive data is insufficiently protected.

Framework‑aligned reporting
SOC 2 and other frameworks can be represented as report templates that pull directly from Sentra’s inventory and posture attributes, giving GRC teams “audit‑ready” exports without rebuilding evidence from scratch.

The result is you can prove control over regulated data, for SOC 2 and beyond, with far less manual overhead.

Mapping SOC 2 Criteria to Data‑Level Evidence

Here’s how a data‑first posture shows up in SOC 2:

CC6.x (Logical and Physical Access Controls)

Evidence: Identity‑to‑data mapping showing which users/roles can access which sensitive datasets across cloud and SaaS.

CC7.x (Change Management / Monitoring)

Evidence: Data Detection & Response (DDR) signals and anomaly analytics around access to crown‑jewel data; logs that tie back to sensitive data stores.

CC8.x (Risk Mitigation)

Evidence: Risk‑prioritized view of data stores based on sensitivity and missing controls, plus remediation workflows or automatic labeling/tagging to tighten upstream policies.

When this data‑level view is in place, SOC 2 becomes evidence selection rather than evidence construction.

A Repeatable SOC 2 Playbook for Security, GRC, and Privacy

To operationalize this approach, many teams follow a recurring pattern:

  1. Define a “regulated data perimeter” for SOC 2: Identify which clouds, SaaS platforms, and on‑prem stores contain in‑scope data (PII, PHI, PCI, financial records).

  1. Instrument with DSPM: Deploy a data security platform like Sentra to discover, classify, and map access to that data perimeter.

  1. Connect GRC to the same source of truth: Have GRC and privacy teams pull their SOC 2 evidence from the same inventory and posture views Security uses for day‑to‑day risk management.

  1. Continuously refine controls: Use posture and DDR insights to reduce exposure, close misconfigurations, and improve your next SOC 2 cycle before it starts.

The more you lean on a shared, data‑centric foundation, the easier it becomes to maintain a trusted, provable compliance posture across frameworks, not just SOC 2.

Turning SOC 2 From a Project Into a Capability

Ultimately, the goal is to stop treating SOC 2 as a once-a-year project and start treating it as an ongoing capability embedded into how your organization operates. Security, GRC, and privacy teams should work from a single, unified view of regulated data and controls. Evidence should always be a few clicks away - not the result of a month-long scramble. And every audit should strengthen your data security posture, not distract from it. If you’re still managing compliance in spreadsheets, it’s worth asking what it would take to make your SOC 2 posture something you can prove on demand.

Ready to end the fire drills and move to continuous compliance? Book a Demo 

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Expert Data Security Insights Straight to Your Inbox
What Should I Do Now:
1

Get the latest GigaOm DSPM Radar report - see why Sentra was named a Leader and Fast Mover in data security. Download now and stay ahead on securing sensitive data.

2

Sign up for a demo and learn how Sentra’s data security platform can uncover hidden risks, simplify compliance, and safeguard your sensitive data.

3

Follow us on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and YouTube for actionable expert insights on how to strengthen your data security, build a successful DSPM program, and more!

RSA 2026 Conference Logo
Going to RSA?

Meet with CISOs from Nestlé, SoFi, and PennyMac

Hear how they are making data AI ready

Join our exclusive RSA Roundtable 

Register Now