GDPR Compliance Failures Lead to Surge in Fines
In recent years, the landscape of data privacy and protection has become increasingly stringent, with regulators around the world cracking down on companies that fail to comply with local and international standards.
The latest high-profile case involves Uber, which was recently fined a staggering €290 million ($324 million) by the Dutch Data Protection Authority (DPA) for violations related to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This is a wake up call for multinational companies.
What is GDPR?
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a data protection law that came into effect in the EU in May 2018. Its goal is to give individuals more control over their personal data and unify data protection rules across the EU.
GDPR gives extra protection to special categories of sensitive data. Both 'controllers' (who decide how data is processed) and 'processors' (who act on their behalf) must comply. Joint controllers may share responsibility when multiple entities manage data.
Who Does the GDPR Apply To?
GDPR applies to both EU-based and non-EU organizations that handle the data of EU residents. The regulation requires organizations to get clear consent for data collection and processing, and it gives individuals rights to access, correct, and delete their data. Organizations must also ensure strong data security and report any data breaches promptly.
What Are the Penalties for Non-Compliance with GDPR?
Non-compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) can result in substantial penalties.
Article 83 of the GDPR establishes the fine framework, which includes the following:
Maximum Fine: The maximum fine for GDPR non-compliance can reach up to 20 million euros, or 4% of the company’s total global turnover from the preceding fiscal year, whichever is higher.
Alternative Penalty: In certain cases, the fine may be set at 10 million euros or 2% of the annual global revenue, as outlined in Article 83(4).
Additionally, individual EU member states have the authority to impose their own penalties for breaches not specifically addressed by Article 83, as permitted by the GDPR’s flexibility clause.
So far, the maximum fine given under GDPR was to Meta in 2023, which was fined $1.3 billion for violating GDPR laws related to data transfers. We’ll delve into the details of that case shortly.
Can Individuals Be Fined for GDPR Breaches?
While fines are typically imposed on organizations, individuals can be fined under certain circumstances. For example, if a person is self-employed and processes personal data as part of their business activities, they could be held responsible for a GDPR breach. However, UK-GDPR and EU-GDPR do not apply to data processing carried out by individuals for personal or household activities.
According to GDPR Chapter 1, Article 4, “any natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or body” can be held accountable for non-compliance. This means that GDPR regulations do not distinguish significantly between individuals and corporations when it comes to breaches.
Specific scenarios where individuals within organizations may be fined include:
- Obstructing a GDPR compliance investigation.
- Providing false information to the ICO or DPA.
- Destroying or falsifying evidence or information.
- Obstructing official warrants related to GDPR or privacy laws.
- Unlawfully obtaining personal data without the data controller's permission.
The Top 3 GDPR Fines and Their Impact
1. Meta - €1.2 Billion ($1.3 Billion), 2023
In May 2023, Meta, the U.S. tech giant, was hit with a staggering $1.3 billion fine by an Irish court for violating GDPR regulations concerning data transfers between the E.U. and the U.S. This massive penalty came after the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, which previously provided legal cover for such transfers, was invalidated in 2020. The court found that the framework failed to offer sufficient protection for EU citizens against government surveillance. This fine now stands as the largest ever under GDPR, surpassing Amazon’s 2021 record.
2. Amazon - €746 million ($781 million), 2021
Which leads us to Amazon at number 2, not bad. In 2021, Amazon Europe received the second-largest GDPR fine to date from Luxembourg’s National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD). The fine was imposed after it was determined that the online retailer was storing advertisement cookies without obtaining proper consent from its users.
3. Instagram - €405 million ($427 million), 2022
The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) fined Instagram for violating children’s privacy online in September 2022. The violations included the public exposure of kids' phone numbers and email addresses. The DPC found that Instagram’s user registration system could default child users' accounts to "public" instead of "private," contradicting GDPR’s privacy by design principles and the regulations aimed at safeguarding children's information.
Uber currently ranks at number 6 with the latest €290 million fine they received from the Dutch Data Protection Authority (DPA) for the GDPR related violations.
Uber’s GDPR Violation
The Dutch DPA accused Uber of transferring sensitive data of European drivers to the United States without implementing appropriate safeguards. This included personal information such as account details, location data, payment information, and even sensitive documents like taxi licenses, criminal records, and medical data. The failure to protect this data adequately, especially after the invalidation of the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield in 2020, constituted a serious violation of GDPR.
Despite Uber's claim that its cross-border data transfer process was compliant with GDPR, the DPA's decision to impose the record fine underscores the growing importance of adhering to stringent data protection regulations. Uber has since ceased the practice, but the financial and reputational damage is already done.
The Implications for Global Companies
The growing frequency of such fines sends a clear message to global companies: compliance with data protection regulations is non-negotiable. As European regulators continue to enforce GDPR rigorously, companies that fail to implement adequate data protection measures risk facing severe financial penalties and reputational harm.
In the case of Uber, the company’s failure to use appropriate mechanisms for data transfers, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, led to significant repercussions. This situation emphasizes the importance of staying current with regulatory changes, such as the introduction of the E.U.-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and ensuring that all data transfer practices are fully compliant.
How Sentra Helps Orgs Stay Compliant with GDPR
Sentra helps organizations maintain GDPR compliance by effectively tagging data belonging to European citizens.
When EU citizens' Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is moved or stored outside of EU data centers, Sentra will detect and alert you in near real-time. Our continuous monitoring and scanning capabilities ensure that any data violations are identified and flagged promptly.
Unlike traditional methods where data replication can obscure visibility and lead to issues during audits, Sentra provides ongoing visibility into data storage. This proactive approach significantly reduces the risk by alerting you to potential compliance issues as they arise.
Sentra does automatic classification of localized data - specifically in this case, EU data. Below you can see an example of how we do this.
The Rise of Compliance Violations: A Wake-up Call
The increasing number of compliance violations and the related hefty fines should serve as a wake-up call for companies worldwide. As the regulatory environment becomes more complex, it is crucial for organizations to prioritize data protection and privacy. By doing so, they can avoid costly penalties and maintain the trust of their customers and stakeholders.
Solutions such as Sentra provide a cost-effective means to ensure sensitive data always has the right posture and security controls - no matter where the data travels - and can alert on exceptions that require rapid remediation. In this way, organizations can remain regulatory compliant, avoid the steep penalties for violations, and ensure the proper, secure use of data throughout their ecosystem.