How to Protect Sensitive Data in AWS

If you had to pick one file format that carries the bulk of your organization’s most sensitive documents, it would be PDF.

Contracts and NDAs, medical records, financial statements, invoices, tax forms, legal filings, HR packets - all of them default to PDF, and all of them tend to be copied, emailed, uploaded, and archived far beyond the systems where they originated. Adobe estimates there are trillions of PDFs in circulation; for most enterprises, a non‑trivial percentage of those live in cloud storage with overly broad access controls.

‍

Despite that, many data security programs still treat PDF scanning as an afterthought. Tools that are perfectly happy parsing an email body or a CSV row suddenly become half‑blind when you hand them a complex multi‑page PDF,  and completely blind if that PDF is just a scanned image.

That is exactly the gap we set out to close with PDF scanning for data security in Sentra.

Why PDFs Are a First‑Class Data Security Risk

PDFs sit at the intersection of three uncomfortable truths:

• They are the default format for high‑risk documents like contracts, patient records, tax filings, and financial reports.
• They are easy to copy and spread - attached to emails, dropped into shared drives, uploaded to SaaS tools, and mirrored into backups.
• They are often opaque to legacy DLP and discovery tools, especially when content is embedded in images or complex layouts.

From a risk perspective, treating PDFs as “less important than databases” makes no sense. If anything, the opposite is true: a single mis‑shared PDF can expose entire customer lists, PHI packets, or undisclosed financials in one move.

How Sentra Scans PDFs for Sensitive Data

Sentra’s PDF scanning is built on the same file parser framework we use for other unstructured formats, with specialized handling for both native text PDFs and image‑based PDFs. Our engine operates in two complementary modes.

Text Mode: Deep Inspection of Native PDF Content

In text mode, we extract all embedded text from each page and separately detect and pull out tables.

That distinction matters. In invoices, financial statements, and tax forms, the critical data often lives in rows and columns, not in narrative paragraphs. Sentra:

‍

• Detects table boundaries in PDFs.
• Extracts cell values into a tabular representation.
• Treats those cells as structured data, not just part of a flat text blob.

Once extracted, this structured view flows into Sentra’s classification engine, which analyzes it with specialized classifiers for:

• PII such as names, email addresses, national IDs, and phone numbers.
• Financial data such as account numbers, routing codes, and transaction details.
• Regulated records such as tax identifiers or health‑related codes.

This approach is far more precise than a naive “search the whole document for 16‑digit numbers” method. It lets you distinguish, for example, between a random ID in the footer and a full set of cardholder details in an itemized table.

Image Mode: Solving the Scanned PDF Problem

A huge fraction of enterprise PDFs are actually just images of paper forms: patient intake sheets, signed contracts, faxed tax returns, screenshots dumped into PDF containers. To a legacy DLP engine, those documents are empty. To Sentra, they are just another OCR input.

‍

Sentra:

• Detects embedded images in PDF pages.
• Extracts those images safely, including JPEG‑compressed content.
• Processes them through our ML‑based OCR pipeline built on transformer‑style models.
• Passes the resulting text into the same classifier stack we use for native text.

The result is that a scanned W‑2 receives the same depth of inspection as a digitally generated one. No practical difference, no exceptions.

Metadata, Encryption, and Hidden Exposure

Most tools stop at visible text. Sentra goes further.

PDF Metadata as a Data Source

PDF metadata can leak far more than people expect:

‍

• Author names and usernames
• Internal file paths and system details
• Document titles and descriptions that reference customers or projects

Sentra parses this metadata, normalizes it, and runs it through the same unstructured classification engine we use for body text and document context. That makes it possible to surface cases where you are unintentionally exposing sensitive details in fields that almost never get reviewed.

Encrypted and Password‑Protected PDFs

Password‑protected or encrypted PDFs are not invisible to Sentra. When our scanners encounter PDFs that cannot be opened for content inspection, we still:

‍

• Identify them as PDFs.
• Record their location and basic properties.
• Surface them in your inventory so you can see where opaque, potentially sensitive PDFs are accumulating, instead of silently skipping them.

In practice, a cluster of unreadable encrypted PDFs in an unexpected bucket is often a sign of data hoarding, shadow IT, or deliberate attempts to evade controls.

Security Architecture – Scanning Inside Your Cloud

All of this processing happens inside your cloud environment, using Sentra’s agentless, in‑cloud scanners rather than shipping PDFs out to a third‑party service. Our parser framework is designed around streaming and format‑aware readers, which means:

‍

• Files are processed as streams, not as long‑lived replicas.
• PDF contents are analyzed in memory by the scanner, avoiding new long‑term copies in external systems.
• The same engine powers analysis across databases, object storage, file systems, and SaaS sources.

The net effect is that Sentra reduces your blind spots around PDFs without turning the security solution itself into a new source of data exposure.

Regulatory Reality – PDFs Are Always in Scope

From a regulatory standpoint, PDFs are undeniably in scope. Frameworks and regulations such as:

‍

• GDPR for data subject rights, record‑keeping, and deletion
• HIPAA for PHI in healthcare organizations
• PCI DSS for cardholder data stored in receipts, statements, and chargeback files
• SOX and other financial reporting controls

do not distinguish between data in databases and data in documents. A stack of PDFs in cloud storage, email archives, or shared drives counts just as much as a customer table in a production database when regulators and auditors review your posture. If your data security strategy covers only structured data and a narrow slice of text documents, you are leaving a disproportionate share of your most sensitive content unprotected.

Bringing PDFs into Your DSPM Strategy

PDFs are not going away. Digital‑first operations guarantee we will see more of them every year, not fewer. That makes them a natural priority for any serious Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) program.

‍

Sentra’s PDF scanning is designed to make PDFs a first‑class citizen in your data security strategy:

‍

• Native text and scanned PDFs both receive full, ML‑powered inspection.
• Tables and forms are treated as structured data for higher‑fidelity classification.
• Metadata and unreadable encrypted PDFs are surfaced instead of ignored.
• Everything runs inside your cloud, alongside support for 100+ other file formats.

You can explore how we extend the same approach across the rest of your data estate, or see it in action by requesting a demo.

<blogcta-big>

Protecting sensitive data in Google Cloud Platform has become a critical priority for organizations navigating cloud security complexities in 2026. As enterprises migrate workloads and adopt AI-driven technologies, understanding how to protect sensitive data in GCP is essential for maintaining compliance, preventing breaches, and ensuring business continuity. Google Cloud offers a comprehensive suite of native security tools designed to discover, classify, and safeguard critical information assets.

Key GCP Data Protection Services You Should Use

Google Cloud Platform provides several core services specifically designed to protect sensitive data across your cloud environment:

‍

• Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS) enables you to create, manage, and control cryptographic keys for both software-based and hardware-backed encryption. Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) give you enhanced control over the encryption lifecycle, ensuring data at rest and in transit remains secured under your direct oversight.
• Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API automatically scans data repositories to detect personally identifiable information (PII) and other regulated data types, then applies masking, redaction, or tokenization to minimize exposure risks.
• Secret Manager provides a centralized, auditable solution for managing API keys, passwords, and certificates, keeping secrets separate from application code while enforcing strict access controls.
• VPC Service Controls creates security perimeters around cloud resources, limiting data exfiltration even when accounts are compromised by containing sensitive data within defined trust boundaries.

Getting Started with Sensitive Data Protection in GCP

Implementing effective data protection begins with a clear strategy. Start by identifying and classifying your sensitive data using GCP's discovery and profiling tools available through the Cloud DLP API. These tools scan your resources and generate detailed profiles showing what types of sensitive information you're storing and where it resides.

‍

Define the scope of protection needed based on your specific data types and regulatory requirements, whether handling healthcare records subject to HIPAA, financial data governed by PCI DSS, or personal information covered by GDPR. Configure your processing approach based on operational needs: use synchronous content inspection for immediate, in-memory processing, or asynchronous methods when scanning data in BigQuery or Cloud Storage.

‍

Implement robust Identity and Access Management (IAM) practices with role-based access controls to ensure only authorized users can access sensitive data. Configure inspection jobs by selecting the infoTypes to scan for, setting up schedules, choosing appropriate processing methods, and determining where findings are stored.

Using Google DLP API to Discover and Classify Sensitive Data

The Google DLP API provides comprehensive capabilities for discovering, classifying, and protecting sensitive data across your GCP projects. Enable the DLP API in your Google Cloud project and configure it to scan data stored in Cloud Storage, BigQuery, and Datastore.

Inspection and Classification

Initiate inspection jobs either on demand using methods like InspectContent or CreateDlpJob, or schedule continuous monitoring using job triggers via CreateJobTrigger. The API automatically classifies detected content by matching data against predefined "info types" or custom criteria, assigning confidence scores to help you prioritize protection efforts. Reusable inspection templates enhance classification accuracy and consistency across multiple scans.

De-identification Techniques

Once sensitive data is identified, apply de-identification techniques to protect it:

‍

• Masking (obscuring parts of the data)
• Redaction (completely removing sensitive segments)
• Tokenization
• Format-preserving encryption

These transformation techniques ensure that even if sensitive data is inadvertently exposed, it remains protected according to your organization's privacy and compliance requirements.

Preventing Data Loss in Google Cloud Environments

Preventing data loss requires a multi-layered approach combining discovery, inspection, transformation, and continuous monitoring. Begin with comprehensive data discovery using the DLP API to scan your data repositories. Define scan configurations specifying which resources and infoTypes to inspect and how frequently to perform scans. Leverage both synchronous and asynchronous inspection approaches. Synchronous methods provide immediate results using content.inspect requests, while asynchronous approaches using DlpJobs suit large-scale scanning operations. Apply transformation methods, including masking, redaction, tokenization, bucketing, and date shifting, to obfuscate sensitive details while maintaining data utility for legitimate business purposes.

‍

Combine de-identification efforts with encryption for both data at rest and in transit. Embed DLP measures into your overall security framework by integrating with role-based access controls, audit logging, and continuous monitoring. Automate these practices using the Cloud DLP API to connect inspection results with other services for streamlined policy enforcement.

Applying Data Loss Prevention in Google Workspace for GCP Workloads

Organizations using both Google Workspace and GCP can create a unified security framework by extending DLP policies across both environments. In the Google Workspace Admin console, create custom rules that detect sensitive patterns in emails, documents, and other content. These policies trigger actions like blocking sharing, issuing warnings, or notifying administrators when sensitive content is detected.

‍

Google Workspace DLP automatically inspects content within Gmail, Drive, and Docs for data patterns matching your DLP rules. Extend this protection to your GCP workloads by integrating with Cloud DLP, feeding findings from Google Workspace into Cloud Logging, Pub/Sub, or other GCP services. This creates a consistent detection and remediation framework across your entire cloud environment, ensuring data is safeguarded both at its source and as it flows into or is processed within your Google Cloud Platform workloads.

Enhancing GCP Data Protection with Advanced Security Platforms

While GCP's native security services provide robust foundational protection, many organizations require additional capabilities to address the complexities of modern cloud and AI environments. Sentra is a cloud-native data security platform that discovers and governs sensitive data at petabyte scale inside your own environment, ensuring data never leaves your control. The platform provides complete visibility into where sensitive data lives, how it moves, and who can access it, while enforcing strict data-driven guardrails.

‍

Sentra's in-environment architecture maps how data moves and prevents unauthorized AI access, helping enterprises securely adopt AI technologies. The platform eliminates shadow and ROT (redundant, obsolete, trivial) data, which not only secures your organization for the AI era but typically reduces cloud storage costs by approximately 20 percent. Learn more about securing sensitive data in Google Cloud with advanced data security approaches.

Understanding GCP Sensitive Data Protection Pricing

GCP Sensitive Data Protection operates on a consumption-based, pay-as-you-go pricing model. Your costs reflect the actual amount of data you scan and process, as well as the number of operations performed. When estimating your budget, consider several key factors:

‍

‍

To better manage spending, estimate your expected data volume and scan frequency upfront. Apply selective scanning or filtering techniques, such as scanning only changed data or using file filters to focus on high-risk repositories. Utilize Google's pricing calculator along with cost monitoring dashboards and budget alerts to track actual usage against projections. For organizations concerned about how sensitive cloud data gets exposed, investing in proper DLP configuration can prevent costly breaches that far exceed the operational costs of protection services.

‍

Successfully protecting sensitive data in GCP requires a comprehensive approach combining native Google Cloud services with strategic implementation and ongoing governance. By leveraging Cloud KMS for encryption management, the Cloud DLP API for discovery and classification, Secret Manager for credential protection, and VPC Service Controls for network segmentation, organizations can build robust defenses against data exposure and loss.

‍

The key to effective implementation lies in developing a clear data protection strategy, automating inspection and remediation workflows, and continuously monitoring your environment as it evolves. For organizations handling sensitive data at scale or preparing for AI adoption, exploring additional GCP security tools and advanced platforms can provide the comprehensive visibility and control needed to meet both security and compliance objectives. As cloud environments grow more complex in 2026 and beyond, understanding how to protect sensitive data in GCP remains an essential capability for maintaining trust, meeting regulatory requirements, and enabling secure innovation.

<blogcta-big>

Most security leaders aren’t asking for “more DLP.” They’re asking why the DLP they already own is noisy, brittle, and still misses real risk. You turn on endpoint, email, and network DLP. You import PCI and PII templates. Within weeks, users complain that normal work is blocked, so policies get relaxed or disabled. Analysts drown in meaningless alerts. Meanwhile, you know there are blind spots in SaaS, cloud data stores, and AI tools that DLP never sees.

‍

The problem usually isn’t that you bought the “wrong” DLP. It’s that DLP is doing too much on its own: trying to discover sensitive data, understand business context, and enforce policies in one step. To improve the functioning of your DLP, you have to separate those responsibilities and give DLP the data intelligence it has always been missing.

‍

This guide walks through seven data loss prevention best practices that:

‍

• Cut DLP false positives and alert fatigue
• Close blind spots across SaaS, cloud, and AI
• Show how to use Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) alongside DLP instead of treating them as competitors

1. Start with a specific DLP problem, not a vague mandate

Many DLP programs are born from a broad requirement like “prevent data loss” or “achieve compliance.” That sounds reasonable, but it’s too fuzzy to drive design decisions. If everything is “data loss,” every event looks important and tuning turns into guesswork. Instead, define one or two sharp, testable problems to solve in the next 90 days.

‍

For example:

‍

• Reduce DLP false positives by 50% while maintaining coverage across email and collaboration tools.
• Eliminate unknown PHI exposures in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace before the next HIPAA audit.
• Stop real customer data from leaking into lower environments and AI training pipelines.

Once you frame the goal concretely, a few things fall into place. You know what to measure (false-positive rate, blind-spot coverage, number of mis‑labeled data stores). You can see which parts are posture problems (where data lives, how it’s labeled, who can touch it) and which are pure enforcement. And you have a clear way to tell whether the program is actually improving, rather than just “having DLP turned on.” In short, give your DLP initiative a narrow, measurable purpose before you touch any rules.

2. Fix classification before you tune DLP rules

Almost every struggling DLP deployment eventually discovers the same truth: it doesn’t really have a DLP problem, it has a classification problem. Traditional DLP leans heavily on pattern matching and static dictionaries. In modern environments, that leads to constant mistakes:

‍

• Internal IDs or ticket numbers mistaken for card data or SSNs
• Highly sensitive business documents missed because they don’t match canned patterns
• Each product (endpoint DLP, email DLP, CASB) trying to re‑implement classification in its own silo

This is exactly the gap DSPM is designed to fill. A platform like Sentra DSPM continuously:

‍

• Discovers sensitive data at scale across cloud, SaaS, data warehouses, on‑prem stores, and AI pipelines, without copying it out of your environment
• Classifies that data using multi‑signal, AI‑driven models that combine entity‑level signals (PII, PCI, PHI fields, secrets) with file‑level semantics (document type, business function, domain)
• Labels assets consistently, for example, by auto‑applying Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP) labels that downstream tools, including DLP, can consume

Once you trust the labels, DLP can stop trying to “guess” sensitivity from raw content and location. Policies get simpler and more stable because they key off well‑defined labels instead of brittle regular expressions.

Best practice: before you tweak another DLP rule, invest in getting classification right with DSPM, then let DLP enforce on the resulting labels.

3. Reduce DLP false positives with labels and context

“Reduce DLP false positives” is one of the most common reasons security teams revisit their DLP strategy. Most false positives come from two root causes:

‍

• Over‑broad content rules that match anything vaguely sensitive
• Lack of business context like; who the user is, which system they’re in, where the data is going, and whether that’s normal behavior

The first step is to move to label‑driven policies wherever possible. Instead of “block anything that looks like a credit card number,” write rules like “block sending files labeled PCI to personal email domains” or “quarantine emails with PHI labels sent outside approved partners.” DSPM plus accurate labeling makes that possible at scale.

The second step is to bring in more context. A file labeled Confidential going to a known external auditor is very different from that same file going to a new personal Dropbox account at 2 a.m.

‍

When you combine labels with:

‍

• Identity and role
• Channel (email, web, SaaS, AI)
• Destination and geography
• Simple behavior analytics (volume, unusual time, unusual location)

You can reserve hard blocks and escalations for situations that actually look risky.

‍

Finally, you need a real feedback loop. Let users override certain DLP prompts with a required justification and log “reported false positives.” Review those regularly with business owners. That feedback is invaluable for tightening rules where they truly matter and relaxing them where they are just creating friction. In practice, enforce on labels first, then refine with business context and user feedback, instead of trying to make regexes infinitely smarter.

4. Treat DSPM and DLP as a single system, not a “DSPM vs DLP” choice

If you search for “DSPM vs DLP,” you’ll find plenty of comparison articles and vendor takes. From the customer’s side, though, the most useful framing is not “which one?” but “what does each do, and how do they work together?”

‍

At a high level:

‍

• DSPM focuses on data-at-rest intelligence: it shows what sensitive data you have, where it resides, who and what can access it, how it’s configured, and whether that posture is acceptable for your risk and compliance requirements.
• DLP focuses on data-in-motion enforcement: it monitors data leaving (or moving within) the organization via email, endpoints, web, SaaS, and APIs, and decides what to block, encrypt, or just log based on policies.

When you connect them, you get a closed loop:

‍

1. DSPM discovers, classifies, and labels sensitive data consistently across cloud, SaaS, on‑prem, and AI.
2. Data access governance uses that context to right‑size permissions and remediate over‑exposure.
3. DLP and related controls enforce label‑driven policies at the edges, with far fewer false positives and blind spots.

DSPM doesn’t replace DLP; it makes DLP accurate, scalable, and cloud/AI‑ready. Takeaway, stop framing it as DSPM versus DLP. Your DLP will only be as good as the DSPM feeding it.

5. Bring SaaS, cloud, and AI into scope for DLP

Most older DLP programs were built around email and endpoints. But in cloud‑first organizations, the riskiest data flows now run through:

‍

• Cloud and object storage (S3, GCS, Azure Blob)
• Data warehouses and lakes (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks)
• SaaS platforms (M365, Google Workspace, Box, Salesforce, Slack, Teams)
• AI systems (M365 Copilot, Gemini for GWS, Bedrock, custom RAG apps)

Trying to bolt classic inline DLP controls onto all of those surfaces is expensive and incomplete. You’ll still miss shadow data, lower environments that contain real customer data, and AI pipelines that consume sensitive content by design.

‍

DSPM gives you a more scalable pattern:

‍

• Inventory and classify sensitive data where it sits across cloud, SaaS, and AI.
• Use that intelligence to drive native controls: MPIP labels and Microsoft Purview DLP, CASB/SSE policies, Snowflake dynamic masking, IAM/CIEM, and AI guardrails.

For example, a healthcare organization might combine:

‍

• Sentra’s DSPM to discover PHI in Google Drive, M365, Salesforce, and Snowflake
• Auto‑labeling of that PHI so Purview and DLP can enforce correctly
• AI‑aware classification to govern which labeled data copilots and agents are allowed to see

See How Valenz Health Uses DSPM to Protect PHI Across AWS, Azure, and Modern Data Platforms

‍

Similarly, the DLP for Google Workspace story shows how cloud‑native, DSPM‑powered classification is essential to make platform DLP effective for unstructured content in OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams. Best practice, treat SaaS, cloud, and AI as first‑class DLP surfaces, and use DSPM to make them visible and governable before you try to enforce.

6. Design DLP policies for real workflows, then harden them

Many DLP programs fail not because the tools are weak, but because the policies were designed for whiteboards, not for real users.

‍

Very often:

‍

• The ruleset is too broad, with dozens of overlapping controls per channel
• Business stakeholders had little input, so workflows break in production
• There’s no staged rollout path; policies jump straight from “off” to “block”

A better pattern is to treat DLP policies as something you product‑manage. Start by expressing a very small set of core policies in business terms, independent of channel.

‍

For example:

‍

• “Regulated data (PII, PCI, PHI) must not leave specific regions or approved partners.”
• “Files labeled Highly Confidential must never be shared to personal email or cloud domains.”
• “AI assistants and copilots may only access data labeled Internal or below.”

Then map those policies onto channels with graduated responses:

‍

• Log only (for simulation and tuning)
• User prompts (“This file is labeled Confidential; are you sure?”)
• Override with justification (captured for review)
• Hard block + ticket for the riskiest conditions

Throughout, involve legal, compliance, HR, and business owners. If DLP events could lead to performance conversations or disciplinary action, you don’t want those stakeholders to be surprised by how the system behaves.

‍

Ready to get started? Read: How to Build a Modern DLP Strategy That Actually Works: DSPM + Endpoint + Cloud DLP

‍

Key idea, roll out label‑driven policies gently, let reality teach you where controls can be strict, and only then lock them down.

7. Measure DLP like a product, not a checkbox

If your goal is to “supercharge DLP so it performs better,” you need to know how it’s performing now, and how changes affect it. That means treating DLP like a product with KPIs, not a compliance box you either have or don’t.

‍

High‑performing teams tend to track four categories:

‍

• Coverage: percentage of data stores under DSPM visibility; proportion of sensitive assets correctly labeled; number of major SaaS and cloud platforms within scope.
• Quality: false positive and false negative rates by policy and channel; serious incidents discovered outside DLP that should have triggered it.
• Operational impact: mean time to detect and respond to data‑loss incidents; analyst hours spent per week on DLP triage; number of issues auto‑remediated via workflows (auto‑labeling, auto‑revoking access, auto‑quarantining content).
• Business alignment: frequency of stakeholder requests to disable or bypass policies; time to prepare for audits compared to prior years.

A platform like Sentra’s data security platform gives you much of this telemetry out of the box through its unified inventory, access graph, and integration hooks into SIEM/SOAR, IAM, DLP, SSE/CASB, and ITSM. Bottom line, you can’t fix what you can’t measure. Decide which DLP metrics matter to your organization and revisit them as you evolve your DSPM + DLP architecture.

What “Supercharge Your DLP” means in practice

When teams say “we need to fix our DLP,” they usually don’t mean “rip everything out.” They mean:

‍

• “We don’t trust the alerts we get.”
• “We know there are blind spots in cloud, SaaS, and AI.”
• “We’re tired of fighting with brittle rules that don’t reflect how the business actually works.”

Supercharging DLP in the cloud and AI era starts with data intelligence. That means:

‍

• Using DSPM to discover and classify sensitive data everywhere
• Applying consistent labels that encode business meaning
• Wiring those labels into the DLP and access controls you already own

From there, DLP can finally do what it was always meant to do: prevent real data loss, at scale, without paralyzing your organization or your AI initiatives. That’s the real promise behind “Supercharge Your DLP.” You don’t start over, you make the DLP you already have smarter, quieter where it should be, and louder where it counts.

<blogcta-big>