All Resources
In this article:
minus iconplus icon
Share the Article

Data Protection and Classification in Microsoft 365

January 28, 2025
5
 Min Read
Data Security

Imagine the fallout of a single misstep—a phishing scam tricking an employee into sharing sensitive data. The breach doesn’t just compromise information; it shakes trust, tarnishes reputations, and invites compliance penalties. With data breaches on the rise, safeguarding your organization’s Microsoft 365 environment has never been more critical.

Data classification helps prevent such disasters. This article provides a clear roadmap for protecting and classifying Microsoft 365 data. It explores how data is saved and classified, discusses built-in tools for protection, and covers best practices for maintaining  Microsoft 365 data protection.

How Is Data Saved and Classified in Microsoft 365? 

Microsoft 365 stores data across tools and services. For example, emails are stored in Exchange Online, while documents and data for collaboration are found in Sharepoint and Teams, and documents or files for individual users are stored in OneDrive. This data is primarily unstructured—a format ideal for documents and images but challenging for identifying sensitive information.

All of this data is largely stored in an unstructured format typically used for documents and images. This format not only allows organizations to store large volumes of data efficiently; it also enables seamless collaboration across teams and departments. However, as unstructured data cannot be neatly categorized into tables or columns, it becomes cumbersome to discern what data is sensitive and where it is stored. 

To address this, Microsoft 365 offers a data classification dashboard that helps classify data of varying levels of sensitivity and data governed by different regulatory compliance frameworks. But how does Microsoft identify sensitive information with unstructured data? 

Microsoft employs advanced technologies such as RegEx scans, trainable classifiers, Bloom filters, and data classification graphs to identify and classify data as public, internal, or confidential. Once classified, data protection and governance policies are applied based on sensitivity and retention labels.

Data classification is vital for understanding, protecting, and governing data. With your ​​Microsoft 365 data classified appropriately, you can ensure seamless collaboration without risking data exposure.

Why data classification is important
Figure 1: Why data classification is important

Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification Tools

Microsoft 365 includes several key tools and frameworks for classifying and securing data. Here are a few. 

Microsoft Purview 

Microsoft Purview is a cornerstone of data classification and protection within Microsoft 365.

Key Features: 

  • Over 200+ prebuilt classifiers and the ability to create custom classifiers tailored to specific business needs.
  • Purview auto-classifies data across Microsoft 365 and other supported apps, such as Adobe Photoshop and Adobe PDF, while users work on them.
  • Sensitivity labels that apply encryption, watermarks, and access restrictions to secure sensitive data.
  • Double Key Encryption to ensure that sensitivity labels persist even when file formats change.
Sensitivity watermarks in M365
Figure 2: Sensitivity watermarks in Microsoft 365 (Source: Microsoft)
Figure 3: Sensitivity labels for information protection policies in Microsoft 365 (Source: Microsoft)

Purview autonomously applies sensitivity labels like "confidential" or "highly confidential" based on preconfigured policies, ensuring optimal access control. These labels persist even when files are shared or converted to other formats, such as from Word to PDF.

Additionally, Purview’s data loss prevention (DLP) policies prevent unauthorized sharing or deletion of sensitive data by flagging and reporting violations in real time. For example, if a sensitive file is shared externally, Purview can immediately block the transfer and alert your security team.

Sensitivity labeling for announcements in M365
Figure 4: Preventing data loss by using sensitivity labels (Source: Microsoft)

Microsoft Defender 

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps strengthens security by providing a cloud app discovery window to identify applications accessing data. Once identified, it classifies files within these applications based on sensitivity, applying appropriate protections as per preconfigured policies.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud - data sensitivity classification
Figure 5: Microsoft Defender data sensitivity classification (Source: Microsoft)

Key Features:

  • Data Sensitivity Classification: Defender identifies sensitive files and assigns protection based on sensitivity levels, ensuring compliance and reducing risk. For example, it labels files containing credit card numbers, personal identifiers, or confidential business information with sensitivity classifications like "Highly Confidential."
  • Threat Detection and Response: Defender detects known threats targeted at sensitive data in emails, collaboration tools (like SharePoint and Teams), URLs, file attachments, and OneDrive. If an admin account is compromised, Microsoft Defender immediately spots the threat, disables the account, and notifies your IT team to prevent significant damage.
  • Automation: Defender automates incident response, ensuring that malicious activities are flagged and remediated promptly.

Intune 

Microsoft Intune provides comprehensive device management and data protection, enabling organizations to enforce policies that safeguard sensitive information on both managed and unmanaged smartphones, computers, and other devices.

Key Features:

  • Customizable Compliance Policies: Intune allows organizations to enforce device compliance policies that align with internal and regulatory standards. For example, it can block non-compliant devices from accessing sensitive data until issues are resolved.
  • Data Access Control: Intune disallows employees from accessing corporate data on compromised devices or through insecure apps, such as those not using encryption for emails.
  • Endpoint Security Management: By integrating with Microsoft Defender, Intune provides endpoint protection and automated responses to detected threats, ensuring only secure devices can access your organization’s network.
Endpoint security overview
Figure 6: Intune device management portal (Source: Microsoft)

Intune supports organizations by enabling the creation and enforcement of device compliance policies tailored to both internal and regulatory standards. These policies detect non-compliant devices, issue alerts, and restrict access to sensitive data until compliance is restored. Conditional access ensures that only secure and compliant devices connect to your network.

Microsoft 365-managed apps like Outlook, Word, and Excel. These policies define which apps can access specific data, such as emails, and regulate permissible actions, including copying, pasting, forwarding, and taking screenshots. This layered security approach safeguards critical information while maintaining seamless app functionality.

Does Microsoft have a DLP Solution?

Microsoft 365’s data loss prevention (DLP) policies represent the implementation of the zero-trust framework. These policies aim to prevent oversharing, accidental deletion, and data leaks across Microsoft 365 services, including Exchange Online, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive, as well as Windows and macOS devices.

Retention policies, deployed via retention labels, help organizations manage the data lifecycle effectively.These labels ensure that data is retained only as long as necessary to meet compliance requirements, reducing the risks associated with prolonged data storage.

How DLP policies work
Figure 7: How DLP policies work (Source: Microsoft)

What is the Microsoft 365 Compliance Center?

The Microsoft 365 compliance center offers tools to manage policies and monitor data access, ensuring adherence to regulations. For example, DLP policies allow organizations to define specific automated responses when certain regulatory requirements—like GDPR or HIPAA—are violated.

Microsoft Purview Compliance Portal: This portal ensures sensitive data is classified, stored, retained, and used in adherence to relevant compliance regulations. Meanwhile, Microsoft 365’s MPIP ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive information, whether collaborating on Teams or sharing files in SharePoint. Together, these tools enable secure collaboration while keeping regulatory compliance at the forefront.

12 Best Practices for Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification

To achieve effective Microsoft 365 data protection and classification, organizations should follow these steps:

  1. Create precise labels, tags, and classification policies; don’t rely solely on prebuilt labels and policies, as definitions of sensitive data may vary by context.
  2. Automate labeling to minimize errors and quickly capture new datasets.
  3. Establish and enforce data use policies and guardrails automatically to reduce risks of data breaches, compliance failures, and insider threat risks. 
  4. Regularly review and update data classification and usage policies to reflect evolving threats, new data storage, and changing compliance laws.o policies must stay up to date to remain effective.
  5. Define context-appropriate DLP policies based on your business needs; factoring in remote work, ease of collaboration, regional compliance standards, etc.
  6. Apply encryption to safeguard data inside and outside your organization.
  7. Enforce role-based access controls (RBAC) and least privilege principles to ensure users only have access to data and can perform actions within the scope of their roles. This limits the risk of accidental data exposure, deletion, and cyberattacks.
  8. Create audit trails of user activity around data and maintain version histories to prevent and track data loss.
  9. Follow the 3-2-1 backup rule: keep three copies of your data, store two on different media, and one offsite.
  10. Leverage the full suite of Microsoft 365 tools to monitor sensitive data, detect real-time threats, and secure information effectively.
  11. Promptly resolve detected risks to mitigate attacks early.
  12. Ensure data protection and classification policies do not impede collaboration to prevent teams from creating shadow data, which puts your organization at risk of data breaches.

For example, consider #3. If a disgruntled employee starts transferring sensitive intellectual property to external devices in preparation for a ransomware attack, having the right data use policies in place will allow your organization to stop the threat before it escalates. 

Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification Limitations

Despite Microsoft 365’s array of tools, there are some key gaps. AI/ML-powered data security posture management (DSPM) and data detection and response (DDR) solutions fill these easily.

The top limitations of Microsoft 365 data protection and classification are the following:

  • Limitations Handling Large Volumes of Unstructured Data: Purview struggles to automatically classify and apply sensitivity labels to diverse and vast datasets, particularly in Azure services or non-Microsoft clouds. 
  • Contextless Data Classification: Without considering context, Microsoft Purview’s MPIP can lead to false positives (over-labeling non-sensitive data) or false negatives (missing sensitive data). 
  • Inconsistent Labeling Across Providers: Microsoft tools are limited to its ecosystem, making it difficult for enterprises using multi-cloud environments to enforce consistent organization-wide labeling.
  • Minimal Threat Response Capabilities: Microsoft Defender relies heavily on IT teams for remediation and lacks robust autonomous responses.
  • Sporadic Interruption of User Activity: Inaccurate DLP classifications can disrupt legitimate data transfers in collaboration channels, frustrating employees and increasing the risk of shadow IT workarounds.

Sentra Fills the Gap: Protection Measures to Address Microsoft 365 Data Risks

Today’s businesses must get ahead of data risks by instituting Microsoft 365 data protection and classification best practices such as least privilege access and encryption. Otherwise, they risk data exposure, damaging cyberattacks, and hefty compliance fines. However, implementing these best practices depends on accurate and context-sensitive data classification in Microsoft 365. 

Sentra’s Cloud-native Data Security Platform enables secure collaboration and file sharing across all Microsoft 365 services including SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, OneNote, Office, Word, Excel, and more. Sentra provides data access governance, shadow data detection, and privacy audit automation for M365 data. It also evaluates risks and alerts for policy or regulatory violations.

Specifically, Sentra complements Purview in the following ways:

  1. Sentra Data Detection & Response (DDR): Continuously monitors for threats such as data exfiltration, weakening of data security posture, and other suspicious activities in real time. While Purview Insider Risk Management focuses on M365 applications, Sentra DDR extends these capabilities to Azure and non-Microsoft applications.
  2. Data Perimeter Protection: Sentra automatically detects and identifies an organization’s data perimeters across M365, Azure, and non-Microsoft clouds. It alerts “organizations when sensitive data leaves its boundaries, regardless of how it is copied or exported.
  3. Shadow Data Reduction: Using context-based analysis powered by Sentra’s DataTreks™, the platform identifies unnecessary shadow data, reducing the attack surface and improving data governance.
  4. Training Data Monitoring: Sentra monitors training datasets continuously, identifying privacy violations of sensitive PII or real-time threats like training data poisoning or suspicious access.
  5. Data Access Governance: Sentra adds to Purview’s data catalog by including metadata on users and applications with data access permissions, ensuring better governance.
  6. Automated Privacy Assessments: Sentra automates privacy evaluations aligned with frameworks like GDPR and CCPA, seamlessly integrating them into Purview’s data catalog.
  7. Rich Contextual Insights: Sentra delivers detailed data context to understand usage, sensitivity, movement, and unique data types. These insights enable precise risk evaluation, threat prioritization, and remediation, and they can be consumed via an API by DLP systems, SIEMs, and other tools.

By addressing these gaps, Sentra empowers organizations to enhance their Microsoft 365 data protection and classification strategies. Request a demo to experience Sentra’s innovative solutions firsthand.

<blogcta-big>

Yair brings a wealth of experience in cybersecurity and data product management. In his previous role, Yair led product management at Microsoft and Datadog. With a background as a member of the IDF's Unit 8200 for five years, he possesses over 18 years of expertise in enterprise software, security, data, and cloud computing. Yair has held senior product management positions at Datadog, Digital Asset, and Microsoft Azure Protection.

Subscribe

Latest Blog Posts

Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
February 22, 2026
4
Min Read

Cloud Data Protection Solutions

Cloud Data Protection Solutions

As enterprises scale cloud adoption and AI integration in 2026, protecting sensitive data across complex environments has never been more critical. Data sprawls across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise systems, creating blind spots that regulators and threat actors are eager to exploit. Cloud data protection solutions have evolved well beyond simple backup and recovery, today's leading platforms combine AI-powered discovery, real-time data movement tracking, access control analysis, and compliance support into unified architectures. Choosing the right solution determines how confidently your organization can operate in the cloud.

Best Cloud Data Protection Solutions

The market spans two distinct categories, each addressing different layers of cloud security.

Backup, Recovery, and Data Resilience

  • Druva Data Security Cloud, Rated 4.9 on Gartner with "Customer's Choice" recognition. Centralized backup, archival, disaster recovery, and compliance across endpoints, servers, databases, and SaaS in hybrid/multicloud environments.
  • Cohesity DataProtect, Rated 4.7. Automates backup and recovery across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures with policy-based management and encryption.
  • Veeam Data Platform, Rated 4.6. Combines secure backup with intelligent data insights and built-in ransomware defenses.
  • Rubrik Security Cloud, Integrates backup, recovery, and automated policy-driven protection against ransomware and compliance gaps across mixed environments.
  • Dell Data Protection Suite, Rated 4.7. Addresses data loss, compliance, and ransomware through backup, recovery, encryption, and deduplication.

Cloud-Native Security and DSPM

  • Sentra, Discovers and governs sensitive data at petabyte scale inside your own environment, with agentless architecture, real-time data movement tracking, and AI-powered classification.
  • Wiz, Agentless scanning, real-time risk prioritization, and automated mapping to 100+ regulatory frameworks across multi-cloud environments.
  • BigID, Comprehensive data discovery and classification with automated remediation, including native Snowflake integration for dynamic data masking.
  • Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Scalable hybrid and multi-cloud protection with AI analytics, DLP, and compliance enforcement throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Integrated multi-cloud security with continuous vulnerability assessments and ML-based threat detection across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud.

What Users Say About These Platforms

User feedback as of early 2026 reveals consistent themes across the leading platforms.

Sentra

Pros:

  • Data discovery accuracy and automation capabilities are standout strengths
  • Compliance and audit preparation becomes significantly smoother, one user described HITECH audits becoming "a breeze"
  • Classification engine reduces manual effort and improves overall efficiency

Cons:

  • Initial dashboard experience can feel overwhelming
  • Some limitations in on-premises coverage compared to cloud environments
  • Third-party sync delays flagged by a subset of users

Rubrik

Pros:

  • Strong visibility across fragmented environments with advanced encryption and data auditing
  • Frequently described as a top choice for cybersecurity professionals managing multi-cloud

Cons:

  • Scalability limitations noted by some reviewers
  • Integration challenges with mature SaaS solutions

Wiz

Pros:

  • Agentless deployment and multi-cloud visibility surface risk context quickly

Cons:

  • Alert overload and configuration complexity require careful tuning

BigID

Pros:

  • Comprehensive data discovery and privacy automation with responsive customer service

Cons:

  • Delays in technical support and slower DSAR report generation reported

As of February 2026, none of these platforms have published Trustpilot scores with sufficient review counts to generate a verified aggregate rating.

How Leading Platforms Compare on Core Capabilities

Capability Sentra Rubrik Wiz BigID
Unified view (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, on-prem) Yes, in-environment, no data movement Yes, unified management Yes, aggregated across environments Yes, agentless, identity-aware
In-place scanning Yes, purely in-place Yes Yes, raw data stays in your cloud Yes
Agentless architecture Purely agentless, zero production latency Primarily agentless via native APIs Agentless (optional eBPF sensor) Primarily agentless, hybrid option
Data movement tracking Yes, DataTreks™ maps full lineage Limited, not explicitly confirmed Yes, lineage mapping via security graph Yes, continuous dynamic tracking
Toxic combination detection Yes, correlates sensitivity with access controls Yes, automated risk assignment Yes, Security Graph with CIEM mapping Yes, AI classifiers + permission analysis
Compliance framework mapping Not confirmed Not confirmed Yes, 100+ frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, EU AI Act) Not confirmed
Automated remediation Sensitivity labeling via Microsoft Purview Label correction via MIP Contextual workflows, no direct masking Native masking in Snowflake; labeling via MIP
Petabyte-scale cost efficiency Proven, 9PB in 72 hours, 100PB at ~$40K Yes, scale-out architecture Per-workload pricing, not proven at PB scale Yes, cost by data sources, not volume

Cloud Data Security Best Practices

Selecting the right platform is only part of the equation. How you configure and operate it determines your actual security posture.

  • Apply the shared responsibility model correctly. Cloud providers secure infrastructure; you are responsible for your data, identities, and application configurations.
  • Enforce least-privilege access. Use role-based or attribute-based access controls, require MFA, and regularly audit permissions.
  • Encrypt data at rest and in transit. Use TLS 1.2+ and manage keys through your provider's KMS with regular rotation.
  • Implement continuous monitoring and logging. Real-time visibility into access patterns and anomalous behavior is essential. CSPM and SIEM tools provide this layer.
  • Adopt zero-trust architecture. Continuously verify identities, segment workloads, and monitor all communications regardless of origin.
  • Eliminate shadow and ROT data. Redundant, obsolete, and trivial data increases your attack surface and storage costs. Automated identification and removal reduces risk and cloud spend.
  • Maintain and test an incident response plan. Documented playbooks with defined roles and regular simulations ensure rapid containment.

Top Cloud Security Tools for Data Protection

Beyond the major platforms, several specialized tools are worth integrating into a layered defense strategy:

  • Check Point CloudGuard, ML-powered threat prevention for dynamic cloud environments, including ransomware and zero-day mitigation.
  • Trend Micro Cloud One, Intrusion detection, anti-malware, and firewall protections tailored for cloud workloads.
  • Aqua Security, Specializes in containerized and cloud-native environments, integrating runtime threat prevention into DevSecOps workflows for Kubernetes, Docker, and serverless.
  • CrowdStrike Falcon, Comprehensive CNAPP unifying vulnerability management, API security, and threat intelligence.
  • Sysdig, Secures container images, Kubernetes clusters, and CI/CD pipelines with runtime threat detection and forensic analysis.
  • Tenable Cloud Security, Continuous monitoring and AI-driven threat detection with customizable security policies.

Complementing these tools with CASB, DSPM, and IAM solutions creates a layered defense addressing discovery, access control, threat detection, and compliance simultaneously.

How Sentra Approaches Cloud Data Protection

For organizations that need to go beyond backup into true cloud data security, Sentra offers a fundamentally different architecture. Rather than routing data through an external vendor, Sentra scans in-place, your sensitive data never leaves your environment. This is particularly relevant for regulated industries where data residency and sovereignty are non-negotiable.

Key Capabilities

  • Purely agentless onboarding, No sidecars, no agents, zero impact on production latency
  • Unified view across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise file shares with continuous discovery and classification at petabyte scale
  • DataTreks™, Creates an interactive map of your data estate, tracking how sensitive data moves through ETL processes, migrations, backups, and AI pipelines
  • Toxic combination detection, Correlates data sensitivity with access controls, flagging high-sensitivity data behind overly permissive policies
  • AI governance guardrails, Prevents unauthorized AI access to sensitive data as enterprises integrate LLMs and other AI systems

In documented deployments, Sentra has processed 9 petabytes in under 72 hours and analyzed 100 petabytes at approximately $40,000. Its data security posture management approach also eliminates shadow and ROT data, typically reducing cloud storage costs by around 20%.

Choosing the Right Fit

The right solution depends on the problem you're solving. If your primary need is backup, recovery, and ransomware resilience, Druva, Veeam, Cohesity, and Rubrik are purpose-built for that. If your challenge is discovering where sensitive data lives and how it moves, particularly for AI adoption or regulatory audits, DSPM-focused platforms like Sentra and BigID are better aligned. For automated compliance mapping across GDPR, HIPAA, and the EU AI Act, Wiz's 100+ built-in framework assessments offer a clear advantage.

Most mature security programs layer multiple tools: a backup platform for resilience, a DSPM solution for data visibility and governance, and a CNAPP or CSPM tool for infrastructure-level threat detection. The key is ensuring these tools share context rather than creating additional silos. As data environments grow more complex and AI workloads introduce new vectors for exposure, investing in cloud data protection solutions that provide genuine visibility, not just coverage, will define which organizations operate with confidence.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Meni Besso
Meni Besso
February 22, 2026
3
Min Read

GDPR Audit Evidence Without the Fire Drill: How to Build a Trusted, Provable Compliance Posture

GDPR Audit Evidence Without the Fire Drill: How to Build a Trusted, Provable Compliance Posture

Modern privacy and security leaders don’t fail GDPR audits because they lack controls. They struggle because they can’t prove those controls quickly and consistently, across all the places regulated data lives. If every GDPR audit still feels like a fire drill; chasing spreadsheets, screenshots, and point‑in‑time exports. It’s a sign you’re missing a trusted, provable compliance posture for regulated data.

This article walks through:

  • What GDPR auditors actually care about
  • Why spreadsheets and legacy tools break down at scale
  • How to build a live, unified view of regulated data and its controls
  • A practical path to make audits predictable (and much less painful)

Throughout, we’ll focus on a specific outcome:

Making it easy for security, GRC, and privacy teams to prove control over regulated data and pass audits with minimal overhead.

What GDPR Auditors Actually Ask For

Nearly every GDPR audit eventually boils down to three questions:

  1. Where is regulated personal data stored?
    Across cloud accounts, SaaS apps, on‑prem databases, and file shares; PII, PHI, PCI, and other regulated categories.

  1. Who can access it, and under what conditions?
    Which identities, roles, and services can reach which data sets, and whether basic protections like encryption, backup, and logging are consistently applied.

  1. Can you produce trustworthy evidence, aligned to the framework?
    Inventory exports, control posture summaries, and data‑store reports that clearly tie regulated data to the controls in place; ideally mapped to GDPR articles and related frameworks (SOC 2, PCI‑DSS, HIPAA, etc.).

If you can’t answer these questions quickly, consistently, and from a single source of truth, you’re always one personnel change or one missed export away from an audit scramble.

Why Spreadsheets and Point Tools Don’t Scale

Many organizations start with:

  • CMDBs and manual data inventories
  • Privacy catalogs for RoPA and DSAR workflows
  • Legacy discovery tools built for on‑prem or single‑cloud environments

At small scale, this can work. But as regulated data expands across multi‑cloud, SaaS, and hybrid estates, several problems emerge:

Fragmented views: One tool knows about databases, another knows about M365/Google Workspace, another about SaaS; none shows the full regulated‑data picture.

Static exports: Evidence lives in CSVs and screenshots that are stale minutes after they’re generated.

Control blind spots: Security posture tools see misconfigurations, but not which ones actually matter for GDPR‑covered data.

High human overhead: Every new audit, business unit, or regulator request spins up a new spreadsheet.

The result: smart people spending weeks cross‑referencing exports instead of improving controls.

What a “Trusted, Provable Compliance Posture” Looks Like

To get out of fire‑drill mode, you need a living, data‑centric foundation for GDPR evidence:

  1. Unified, high‑accuracy regulated‑data inventory
  • Discovery and classification of regulated data across cloud, SaaS, and on‑prem, not just one stack.
  • Consistent data classes for PII/PHI/PCI and industry‑specific artifacts (finance, HR, healthcare, IP, etc.)

  1. Continuous control checks around that data
  • Encryption, backup, access controls, logging, and other protections evaluated in context of the data they protect, reported as compliance posture signals rather than raw misconfigurations.

  1. Audit‑ready, framework‑aligned reporting
  • Pre‑built GDPR and related report templates that pull from the same underlying inventory and posture engine, so evidence is consistent across audits and stakeholders.

  1. Shared visibility for Security, GRC, and Privacy
  • Security sees risk and controls; GRC sees framework mappings; Privacy sees DSAR and data‑subject context; all using the same underlying data catalog and posture engine.

When these pieces are in place, you move from “rebuilding” evidence for every audit to proving an already‑known posture with low incremental effort.

How Sentra Helps You Get There

Sentra is designed as a data‑first security and compliance platform that sits on top of your cloud, SaaS, and on‑prem environments and focuses specifically on regulated data. Key capabilities for GDPR:

  • Unified discovery & classification of regulated data
    Sentra builds a single catalog of PII/PHI/PCI and other regulated data across your multi‑cloud, SaaS, and on‑prem landscape, powered by high‑accuracy, AI‑driven classification.

  • Access mapping and control posture
    It maps which identities can access which sensitive stores, and continuously evaluates encryption, backup, access, and logging posture around those stores, surfacing issues as prioritized signals instead of isolated misconfigurations.

  • Next‑gen, audit‑ready reporting
    Sentra’s reporting layer generates GDPR‑aligned PDF reports, inventory CSVs, and posture summaries that non‑technical GRC, legal, and auditor stakeholders can consume directly.

Together, these capabilities give you exactly what GDPR reviewers expect to see without manual collation every time.

A Practical Three‑Step Path to GDPR Confidence

You don’t need a multi‑year transformation to get started. Most teams can make visible progress in a few phases:

  1. Catalog high‑value GDPR domains
  • Prioritize key regions, business units, and platforms (e.g., EU customer data in AWS + M365).
  • Use DSPM tooling to build a unified regulated‑data inventory across those estates.

  1. Attach control posture and ownership
  • Connect encryption, backup, access, and logging signals directly to each regulated data store.
  • Identify clear owners and remediation paths for misaligned controls.

  1. Standardize evidence workflows
  • Move from ad‑hoc exports to standardized GDPR (and multi‑framework) reports generated from the same underlying catalog and posture views.
  • Train Security, GRC, and Privacy teams to pull the same reports and speak from the same “source of truth” during audits.

The outcome is more than just a smoother audit. You achieve a trusted, provable compliance posture that reduces risk, accelerates evidence collection, and frees your teams to focus on better controls, not better spreadsheets.

Where to Go Next

If your last GDPR audit felt more chaotic than it should have, that’s often a signal that your regulated-data posture isn’t yet something you can demonstrate confidently on demand. Compliance shouldn’t depend on last-minute spreadsheets, manual sampling, or cross-team scrambling. It should be measurable, repeatable, and defensible at any point in time.

A focused proof of value with a modern DSPM platform can quickly surface how much regulated data you actually hold and where it resides, highlight gaps or inconsistencies in existing controls, and clarify what GDPR-aligned evidence could look like in practice - without the fire drill. The goal isn’t just passing the next audit, but building a posture you can continuously prove.

Read More
Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
February 20, 2026
4
Min Read

BigID vs Sentra: A Cloud‑Native DSPM Built for Security Teams

BigID vs Sentra: A Cloud‑Native DSPM Built for Security Teams

When “Enterprise‑Grade” Becomes Too Heavy

BigID helped define the first generation of data discovery and privacy governance platforms. Many large enterprises use it today for PI/PII mapping, RoPA, and DSAR workflows.

But as environments have shifted to multi‑cloud, SaaS, AI, and massive unstructured data, a pattern has emerged in conversations with security leaders and teams:

  • Long, complex implementations that depend on professional services
  • Scans that are slow or brittle at large scale
  • Noisy classification, especially on unstructured data in M365 and file shares
  • A UI and reporting model built around privacy/GRC more than day‑to‑day security
  • Capacity‑based pricing that’s hard to justify if you don’t fully exploit the platform

Security leaders are increasingly asking:

“If we were buying today, for security‑led DSPM in a cloud‑heavy world, would we choose BigID again, or something built for today’s reality?”

This page gives a straight comparison of BigID vs Sentra through a security‑first lens: time‑to‑value, coverage, classification quality, security use cases, and ROI.

BigID in a Nutshell

Strengths

  • Strong privacy, governance, and data intelligence feature set
  • Well‑established brand with broad enterprise adoption
  • Deep capabilities for DSARs, RoPA, and regulatory mapping

Common challenges security teams report

  • Implementation heaviness: significant setup, services, and ongoing tuning
  • Performance issues: slow and fragile scans in large or complex estates
  • Noise: high false‑positive rates for some unstructured and cloud workloads
  • Privacy‑first workflows: harder to operationalize for incident response and DSPM‑driven remediation
  • Enterprise‑grade pricing: capacity‑based and often opaque, with costs rising as data and connectors grow

If your primary mandate is privacy and governance, BigID may still be a fit. If your charter is data security; reducing cloud and SaaS risk, supporting AI, and unifying DSPM with detection and access governance, Sentra is built for that outcome.

See Why Enterprises Chose Sentra Over BigID.

Sentra in a Nutshell

Sentra is a cloud‑native data security platform that unifies:

  • DSPM – continuous data discovery, classification, and posture
  • Data Detection & Response (DDR) – data‑aware threat detection and monitoring
  • Data Access Governance (DAG) – identity‑to‑data mapping and access control

Key design principles:

  • Agentless, in‑environment architecture: connect via cloud/SaaS APIs and lightweight on‑prem scanners so data never leaves your environment.
  • Built for cloud, SaaS, and hybrid: consistent coverage across AWS, Azure, GCP, data warehouses/lakes, M365, SaaS apps, and on‑prem file shares & databases.
  • High‑fidelity classification: AI‑powered, context‑aware classification tuned for both structured and unstructured data, designed to minimize false positives.
  • Security‑first workflows: risk scoring, exposure views, identity‑aware permissions, and data‑aware alerts aligned to SOC, cloud security, and data security teams.

If you’re looking for a BigID alternative that is purpose-built for modern security programs, not just privacy and compliance teams, this is where Sentra pulls ahead as a clear leader.

BigID vs Sentra at a Glance

Dimension BigID Sentra
Primary DNA Privacy, data intelligence, governance Data security platform (DSPM + DDR + DAG)
Deployment Heavier implementation; often PS-led Agentless, API-driven; connects in minutes
Data stays where? Depends on deployment and module Always in your environment (cloud and on-prem)
Coverage focus Strong on enterprise data catalogs and privacy workflows Strong on cloud, SaaS, unstructured, and hybrid (including on-prem file shares/DBs)
Unstructured & SaaS depth Varies by environment; common complaints about noise and blind spots Designed to handle large unstructured estates and SaaS collaboration as first-class citizens
Classification Pattern- and rule-heavy; can be noisy at scale AI/NLP-driven, context-aware, tuned to minimize false positives
Security use cases Good for mapping and compliance; security ops often need extra tooling Built for risk reduction, incident response, and identity-aware remediation
Pricing model Capacity-based, enterprise-heavy Designed for PB-scale efficiency and security outcomes, not just volume

Time‑to‑Value & Implementation

BigID

  • Often treated as a multi‑quarter program, with POCs expanding into large projects.
  • Connectors and policies frequently rely on professional services and specialist expertise.
  • Day‑2 operations (scan tuning, catalog curation, workflow configuration) can require a dedicated team.

Sentra

  • Installs quickly in minutes with an agentless, API‑based deployment model, so teams start seeing classifications and risk insights almost immediately.  
  • Provides continuous, autonomous data discovery across IaaS, PaaS, DBaaS, SaaS, and on‑prem data stores, including previously unknown (shadow) data, without custom connectors or heavy reconfiguration. 
  • Scans hundreds of petabytes and any size of data store in days while remaining highly compute‑efficient, keeping operational costs low. 
  • Ships with robust, enterprise‑ready scan settings and a flexible policy engine, so security and data teams can tune coverage and cadence to their environment without vendor‑led projects. 

If your BigID rollout has stalled or never moved beyond a handful of systems, Sentra’s “install‑in‑minutes, immediate‑value” model is a very different experience.

Coverage: Cloud, SaaS, and On‑Prem

BigID

  • Strong visibility across many enterprise data sources, especially structured repositories and data catalogs.
  • In practice, customers often cite coverage gaps or operational friction in:
    • M365 and collaboration suites
    • Legacy file shares and large unstructured repositories
    • Hybrid/on‑prem environments alongside cloud workloads

Sentra

  • Built as a cloud‑native data security platform that covers:
    • IaaS/PaaS: AWS, Azure, GCP
    • Data platforms: warehouses, lakes, DBaaS
    • SaaS & collaboration: M365 (SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, Exchange) and other SaaS
    • On‑prem: major file servers and relational databases via in‑environment scanners
  • Designed so that hybrid and multi‑cloud environments are the norm, not an edge case.

If you’re wrestling with a mix of cloud, SaaS, and stubborn on‑prem systems, Sentra’s ability to treat all of that as one data estate is a big advantage.

Classification Quality & Noise

BigID

  • Strong foundation for PI/PII discovery and privacy use cases, but security teams often report:
    • High volumes of hits that require manual triage
    • Lower precision across certain unstructured or non‑traditional sources
  • Over time, this can erode trust because analysts spend more time triaging than remediating.

Sentra

  • Uses advanced NLP and model‑driven classification to understand context as well as content.
  • Tuned to deliver high precision and recall for both structured and unstructured data, reducing false positives.
  • Enriches each finding with rich context e.g.; business purpose, sensitivity, access, residency, security controls, so security teams can make faster decisions.

The result: shorter, more accurate queues of issues, instead of endless spreadsheets of ambiguous hits.

Use Cases: Privacy Catalog vs Security Control Plane

BigID

  • Excellent for:
    • DSAR handling and privacy workflows
    • RoPA and compliance mapping
    • High‑level data inventories for audit and governance
  • For security‑specific use cases (DSPM, incident response, insider risk), teams often end up:
    • Exporting BigID findings into SIEM/SOAR or other tools
    • Building custom workflows on top, or supplementing with a separate platform

Sentra

Designed from day one as a data‑centric security control plane, not just a catalog:

  • DSPM: continuous mapping of sensitive data, risk scoring, exposure views, and policy enforcement.
  • DDR: data‑aware threat detection and activity monitoring across cloud and SaaS.
  • DAG: mapping of human and machine identities to data, uncovering over‑privileged access and toxic combinations.
  • Integrates with SIEM, SOAR, IAM/CIEM, CNAPP, CSPM, DLP, and ITSM to push data context into the rest of your stack.

Pricing, Economics & ROI

BigID

  • Typically capacity‑based and custom‑quoted.
  • As you onboard more data sources or increase coverage, licensing can climb quickly.
  • When paired with heavier implementation and triage cost, some organizations find it hard to defend renewal spend.

Sentra

  • Architecture and algorithms are optimized so the platform can scan very large estates efficiently, which helps control both infrastructure and license costs.
  • By unifying DSPM, DDR, and data access governance, Sentra can collapse multiple point tools into one platform.
  • Higher classification fidelity and better automation translate into:
    • Less analyst time wasted on noise
    • Faster incident containment
    • Smoother, more automated audits

For teams feeling the squeeze of BigID’s TCO, an evaluation with Sentra often shows better security outcomes per dollar, not just a different line item.

When to Choose BigID vs Sentra

BigID may be the better fit if:

  • Your primary buyer and owner are privacy, legal, or data governance teams.
  • You need a feature‑rich privacy platform first, with security as a secondary concern.
  • You’re comfortable with a more complex, services‑led deployment and ongoing management model.

Sentra is likely the better fit if:

  • You are a security org leader (CISO, Head of Cloud Security, Director of Data Security).
  • Your top problems are cloud, SaaS, AI, and unstructured data risk, not just privacy reporting.
  • You want a BigID alternative that:
    • Deploys agentlessly in days
    • Handles hybrid/multi‑cloud by design
    • Unifies DSPM, DDR, and access governance into one platform
    • Reduces noise and drives measurable risk reduction

Next Step: Run a Sentra POV Against Your Own Data

The clearest way to compare BigID and Sentra is to see how each performs in your actual environment. Run a focused Sentra POV on a few high‑value domains (e.g., key cloud accounts, M365, a major warehouse) and measure time‑to‑value, coverage, noise, and risk reduction side by side.

Check out our guide, The Dirt on DSPM POVs, to structure the evaluation so vendors can’t hide behind polished demos.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Expert Data Security Insights Straight to Your Inbox
What Should I Do Now:
1

Get the latest GigaOm DSPM Radar report - see why Sentra was named a Leader and Fast Mover in data security. Download now and stay ahead on securing sensitive data.

2

Sign up for a demo and learn how Sentra’s data security platform can uncover hidden risks, simplify compliance, and safeguard your sensitive data.

3

Follow us on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and YouTube for actionable expert insights on how to strengthen your data security, build a successful DSPM program, and more!

RSA 2026 Conference Logo
Going to RSA?

Meet with CISOs from Nestlé, SoFi, and PennyMac

Hear how they are making data AI ready

Join our exclusive RSA Roundtable 

Register Now